How does the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017” affect Health Care today and in the future?

Now that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 has passed, there is a ton of conjecture on the value and impact of the bill, who will gain and who will lose upon its passage, etc. But I would like to focus on the specific changes in the bill that apply directly to healthcare. There are three significant changes that I would like to focus on:

  • The Repeal of the Individual Mandate penalties
  • The Medical Expense Deduction reduction (temporary)
  • The  orphan drug tax credit changes

The Repeal of the Individual Mandate penalties is not actually correct as the bill doesn’t repeal the individual mandate, it reduces the penalty for not getting coverage to zero (in essence, it’s the same as repeal as it will eliminate any penalties). The question is how will this change impact the individual markets? We know that some have estimated massive changes and other say the impact will be much less. As there is plenty of comment on this change, I have picked out three articles on the subject, each with their own perspectives for you to review. They are from VOX, CNN and the New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/18/us/politics/tax-cut-obamacare-individual-mandate-repeal.html

http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/15/news/economy/obamacare-individual-mandate-tax/index.html

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/12/18/16792702/health-care-questions-tax-bill-answered

 

The Temporary Medical Expense Deduction reduction was a late but significant change to the act. Initially, the bill was to eliminate the deduction for medical expenses but due to intense lobbying, the bill actually expands the deduction for two years. All taxpayers who itemize their deductions will be able to write off qualifying medical expenses that exceed 7.5 percent of their adjusted gross income for tax years 2017 and 2018. After that, the threshold would return to the current 10 percent. This is a very significant change and for a better understanding of the change and its implications, I would recommend this very good article from CNBC:

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/16/gop-tax-bill-expands-medical-expense-deduction-for-two-years.html

The final significant change is the changes to the Orphan Drug Tax Creditwhich encourages firms to research new medicines for diseases that don’t affect as many people. This tax credit is partially preserved as the final bill changes the 3-decade-old orphan drug tax credit to be cut in half. Current law allows companies to write off 50% of the research costs of developing drugs for diseases that strike fewer than 200,000 people. Now, the credit will drop to 25%. For pharmaceutical companies, patients and advocacy groups promoting drugs that deal with rare diseases this is bad news but it is a partial victory as some versions of the bill had proposed a complete elimination of this credit. For more on this I would suggest reviewing:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-02/drugmakers-rare-disease-r-d-incentives-are-cut-in-gop-tax-bill

In conclusion, it is certainly not clear what the landscape of Health Care Insurance will be in the future based on the passing of this bill but it will be very interesting if the pundits are correct or the law of unintended consequences will rear its ugly head.

No matter what benefits and how are provided, the need to communicate those enrollments quickly and efficiently to insurance companies will be an ongoing need. SoftCare’s EnrollmentPlus was designed by an Advisory Council of industry enrollment experts to facilitate the easy implementation of electronic enrollments from Employer Groups through Enrollment Vendors to Insurance Carriers. Call us for more details on click on https://softcare.cominsurance-plans/ on how EnrollmentPlus can fit into your electronic enrollment architecture.

 

Mike Cobban, Mike.cobban@softcare.com

 

“Medicaid for All” – The future of U.S. Healthcare Insurance?

Now that the debate on the “repeal and replacement” of Obamacare is in the hands of the U.S. Senate, the question becomes, what will happen next? Which version of the AHCA will become the law of the land.  To get a very good perspective on what challenges that the Senate has to craft an effective legislative solution, please read the following article from the NPR.

http://www.npr.org/2017/06/05/531221275/the-senates-4-big-problems-with-health-care

There are some folks who believe that the whole idea of regulation of Health care should be a state and not Federal responsibility. For a good primer on the concept, have a look at the following links.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/335539-healthcare-is-not-a-federal-responsibility-leave-it-to-the

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/01/04/doctor-s-straight-talk-america-your-health-care-is-not-federal-responsibility.html

Some states have started looking at alternatives to Federal control of Health Care. Some states like California have proceeded with legislation to create a state run single payer solution for all. There of course are a myriad of opinions and issues with this type of solution. Here are a couple of pretty interesting takes on the concept.

http://dailysignal.com/2017/05/30/california-pushes-forward-400-billion-universal-health-care-bill/

http://www.modbee.com/opinion/state-issues/article155073799.html

Another alternative concept in this debate is to allow states to offer residents the option to buy their healthcare insurance via the existing Medicaid system. Medicaid provides low-cost care to millions of the nation’s oldest, sickest and most vulnerable populations.

In 2013, a report by the Urban Institute states (https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/8440-what-difference-does-medicaid-make2.pdf)  that if an average adult on Medicaid had traditional private insurance instead, the cost of care would be over 25 percent higher. The concept is to eliminate the insurance exchanges while allowing exchange beneficiaries to buy into Medicaid, using tax credits to pay the premiums. Recent surveys showing that Medicaid beneficiaries are generally satisfied with their coverage, more so than their exchange counterparts, makes the case even more persuasive.

For a full read on this concept, please see the following article in the New Your Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/opinion/obamacare-repeal-medicaid.html?_r=0

The state that has started down this path the furthest is Nevada with the passing of A.B. 374 (https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/79th2017/Bills/AB/AB374_R1.pdf). This bill which is waiting for signature by Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval is based on the concept that because states have a large role in running Medicaid, they can move these proposals forward with less involvement of the federal government and would be controlled by Carson City not Washington.

The buy-in coverage would be pretty much identical to the coverage traditional Medicaid provides, although it would not cover emergency medical transportation (a benefit of the program tailored to the low-income population it traditionally serves). This bill has a long way to go before it becomes the law of the land (including getting a Federal “waiver” to demonstrate the value of it) but in the Health Care Debate, anything alternative is worth debating. For information more information on this bill, please read:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/6/15731622/nevada-medicaid-for-all

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/06/nevada-is-considering-a-revolutionary-health-care-experiment.html

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-nevada-health-coverage-20170607-story.html

Or if you want to listen to a discussion on its merits, please click on the following link.

http://kjzz.org/content/487913/nevada-legislature-passes-medicaid-all-bill

In conclusion, it is certainly not clear what the landscape of Health Care Insurance will be in the future but concepts such as “Medicaid for all” are interesting alternatives to be considered.

No matter what benefits and how are provided, the need to communicate those enrollments quickly and efficiently to insurance companies will be an ongoing need. SoftCare’s EnrollmentPlus was designed by an Advisory Council of industry enrollment experts to facilitate the easy implementation of electronic enrollments from Employer Groups through Enrollment Vendors to Insurance Carriers. Call us for more details on click on https://softcare.cominsurance-plans/ on how EnrollmentPlus can fit into your electronic enrollment architecture.

Mike Cobban

Mike.cobban@softcare.com

Director of Operations and Support

SoftCare Solutions | A Division of MTBC

Copyright 2024 | All Rights Reserved